A Review of David Lynch’s “Inland Empire”

David Lynch’s latest cinematic mind bender, INLAND EMPIRE, was finally released on DVD this Tuesday, August 14th after a brief, enigmatic, and very limited run in theaters, where Lynch personally distributed the film in true independent fashion much to the frustration of many of his fans who never got the chance to see the film theatrically.  The film is sure to please his cult of fans, and for the first time ever, he has released a DVD full of 2nd disk extras including vignettes of him cooking, talking about ideas and film and music, clips of his passionate hands-on style of directing on INLAND EMPIRE, and discarded scenes from the film.

Dreams of a Dying Empire, 14 August 2007
8/10
Author: David H. Schleicher from New Jersey, USA

Taking the murderous jealous husband theme of “Lost Highway” and melding it into the dreams of a tortured actress theme of “Mulholland Drive,” David Lynch fluidly immerses his recurring dark fantasies into a story revolving around a Polish-Gypsy legend and a cursed movie production and delivers his most experimental film since “Eraserhead” with his epic three-hour “Inland Empire.”

The most experimental part of this is Lynch’s use of a hand-held digital camera to shoot the entire film. While I personally prefer the deep texture of film over the superficial sharpness of digital, much of Lynch’s trademarks translate surprisingly well to the new medium. Lynch’s hyper manipulation of lighting, fading in and out of absolute darkness, super close-ups, transposing of images over one another, and making some scenes literally dissolve into the next frame, all come across sharp and artistically satisfying. There are points, however, where Lynch so repeatedly shows Laura Dern walking down dark hallways and dimly lit staircases into moody savagely lit rooms decked out with weird lamps that I half expect the director’s next project to be a home decor line for the film-noir enthusiast.

There will be those who wish to discuss the plot of “Inland Empire” and insist on figuring it all out. Upon first viewing, I decided to simply enjoy the ride. At three hours, there’s lots of filler involving chatty and dancing prostitutes (who play the role of a post-modern Greek chorus and at one point do a rendition of “The Locomotion” that is both horrifying and hilarious), a sitcom staring talking rabbits, and some sort of complex story involving a Polish carnival, while inter-spliced into the madness is a wicked little psychological thriller about an actress who literally gets lost in her new role. The best morsels are the interwoven scenes of Laura Dern (beat-up, harrowing, and with a cool Southern drawl) waxing poetically in monologue fashion about her tragic love life to a man (presumably a therapist) and some beautifully shot scenes that take place on a dark snow-covered street in 19th century Poland that seem to have been exorcised from a completely different and dreadfully thrilling film. Lynch, however, gives many clues for those wanting to dissect the piece: 9:45, room number 47, a magic watch (similar to the ring from “Twin Peaks: FWWM “), the “LB” tattooed on Dern’s hand, the letters “AXXONN” appearing repeatedly on walls and doorways, Grace Zabriskie’s bizarre telling of an “old tale” when we first meet Laura Dern’s character, and perhaps secrets hidden in the dialogue of the prostitutes, the rabbits, and Harry Dean Stanton. The film is so long, and so jumbled, however, that I think it’s better to digest it as is, unlike “Mulholland Drive” which was exhilarating to examine “between the scenes.”

Lynch, forever in love with Hollywood as a city of dreams, is again master of the disembodied scene. Like Naomi Watt’s mesmerizing audition scene in “Mulholland Drive” (which in no small non-ironic way launched Watt’s career into the stratosphere) there’s a killer line-reading about thirty minutes into the “Inland Empire” where you don’t really care what Laura Dern is talking about or what film she is in, it’s just you watching her playing an actress getting totally lost in her lines, and it’s beautiful. Lynch’s masterful juxtapositions of the profane with the profound, light with dark, beauty with pure terror, no matter what non-linear incomprehensible way they are presented, are true cinematic treats to experience for those willing to open their minds to the ocean of possibilities.

Originally Published on the Internet Movie Database:

http://imdb.com/title/tt0460829/usercomments-172

Advertisements

5 comments on “A Review of David Lynch’s “Inland Empire”

  1. zapora says:

    I love David Lynch and can’t wait to watch this film. I ordered it off his website and have promised to wait and watch it with friends who love his movies as much as I do. Great review!! I can’t wait to see it.

    Zapora, I hope you and your friends have enjoyed it! (Lynch films make such great social drinking games the third and fourth times around) –DHS

  2. “Lynch’s movies are not about monsters (i.e. people whose intrinsic natures are evil) but about hauntings, about evil as environment, possibility, force…Lynch’s villains seem not merely wicked or sick but ecstatic, transported: they are, literally, possessed…”

    (from David Foster Wallace’s A Supposedly Fun Thing I’ll Never Do Again)

    David Lynch’s fiscal success and longevity in our blockbuster era is surprising, anomalous—singular…

    For the full article click here.

    Jordan, WOW! I love the expansive analysis! Very astute. –DHS

  3. Demob Happy says:

    I have to say this one didn’t do it for me at all. I think for all the disconnectedness and dream-like abstraction of Mulholland Drive it still amounted to something emotionally tangible – ultimately we could empathise with Naomi Watts’ character and care that she should be stuck in this nightmare of personal failure and unfulfilled fantasy. ‘Inland Empire’ just didn’t deliver a reason for me to care. It was so deconstructed, or structureless – apparantly Lynch made it up scene by scene – that I had no hook into the characters to invest in emotionally. Granted, this is not always necessary, but even as a purely impressionistic piece I didn’t feel this was particularly interesting. Many old Lynch visual and thematic tricks were repeated and rather loosely threaded together. Still a big fan, but hope he might make something as emotionally resonant as Elephant Man again one day.

    James, despite the lack of structure for Inland Empire, I still enjoyed the experimental style of it, and on some level I connected with Laura Dern’s performance but not necessarily with her characters. I agree, I didn’t care about the fate of Dern as much as I did Naomi Watts in Mulholland Drive. I would also like to see Lynch do something along the lines of The Elephant Man again, though that seems doubtful. –DHS

  4. jamesewan says:

    Apparently he’s fallen in love with the digital medium now, so I think he probably sees more improvised, more spontaneous filmmaking as the way forward…

    James, this is my fear, as I thought it was interesting for Inland Empire, but I wouldn’t want to see it explored futher. Though he may bore of it eventually and come back to film and blow us away with something totally unexpected. –DHS

  5. New Amazon eBook unlocks David Lynch’s INLAND EMPIRE. “Old World Politics, New World Prophecy: Understanding David Lynch’s INLAND EMPIRE”. Rabbits, AXXoNN, Poland all explained. Here is the link:

    http://www.amazon.com/World-Politics-Prophecy-Understanding-ebook/dp/B004LGS7I6/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1326525878&sr=8-1

Provide your own Spin and tell us what you think!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s