A Review of Darren Aronofsky’s “The Wrestler”

Evan Rachel Wood and Mickey Rourke walk along the lonely Jersey Shore on a cold winter's day in THE WRESTLER.

Evan Rachel Wood and Mickey Rourke walk along the lonely Jersey Shore on a cold winter's day in THE WRESTLER.

 Down and Out in New Jersey, 9 January 2009
7/10
Author: David H. Schleicher from New Jersey, USA

A fading wrestling star (Mickey Rourke, perfectly cast) suffers a heart attack and must battle with being down and out in Sh*thole, New Jersey in Darren Aronofsky’s gritty character piece, The Wrestler.  Message to Hollywood: there actually are nice places in Jersey…really…I’m not joking…trust me…but that’s another story.

Aronofsky utilizes a self-consciously shaky camera and grainy cinematography to emphasize his depiction of a life literally on the ropes. For much of the film we are walking with the camera behind Rourke seeing everything from his point of view–another stylistic choice that may wear on some viewer’s nerves while seem like a stroke of genius to others.

Admittedly I’ve never understood the appeal of pro wrestling, but I imagined it could be a decent vehicle for a character drama. Aronofsky delivers a mixed bag in this respect. Despite the expertly edited piece detailing the humorously brutal and tragic bout that leads to the aforementioned heart attack and the match that closes the film, the remainder of the wrestling bits are unnecessary and really add nothing to the story. The scenes in a shady gentleman’s club (featuring a fabulously adept Marisa Tomei playing the over-the-hill but still hot stripper friend with a heart of gold) and the clips detailing Rourke’s character’s everyday struggles (including some great bits where he works a deli counter) are slightly more appealing and deliver some genuine moments. However, the scenes where he attempts to reconcile with his estranged daughter (an over-acting Evan Rachel Wood) seem staged and under-developed, which undermines the documentary style feel of the rest of the film. I won’t deny I felt something for these characters, but haven’t we seen this all before?

As finely tailored as Mickey Rourke is to his part, his is essentially a one-note character where we see him in varying stages of failure that lead him to believe the only place he can find acceptance is in the phony but dangerous world inside the ring. As good as Rourke and Tomei are, the script plays their story safe and succumbs to clichés. That being said, The Wrestler is still more engaging than your average Hollywood character study, and it’s worth viewing for the occasionally authentic moment and the fine performances from Rourke and Tomei. But as Bruce Springsteen’s theme song played over a black screen before the credits rolled, I couldn’t help feeling sorry for Rourke and his character–and maybe that was the point. They try their hardest, but the film in which they appear isn’t worth the hype.

Originally Published on the Internet Movie Database.

Advertisements

4 comments on “A Review of Darren Aronofsky’s “The Wrestler”

  1. S L says:

    I’d say that’s a fairly accurate and fair review of the film.
    I couldn’t help but be disappointed with it. I’m a huge fan of Aronofsky, and I think the film suffered from not having his writing touch.

    Some of the dialogue, specifically between Rourke and Wood is so hollow that it bogs the whole thing down. Definitely a victim of the hype-machine.

    SL
    http://thesilencekid.com

    SL, yeah, I was let down by Wood and that whole story-line. It was trite, and she’s one of those naturally talented young actresses who will over-act if the director doesn’t reel her in, and Aronofsky (or maybe the screenwriter) dropped the ball in that regard. –DHS

  2. coffee says:

    Mickey Rourke filled his role in The Wrestler really well… maybe too well

    Coffee, yeah, it was almost eerie, wasn’t it? –DHS

  3. Forrest Hartman says:

    Nice review David.

    I didn’t find it as inauthentic (is that a word) as you, but it has certainly been over-hyped.

    Mickey Rourke is great, but I think it’s a shame that he’s taking the spotlight away from Leonardo DiCaprio’s “Revolutionary Road” performance. Leo’s outing isn’t as flashy as Rourke’s but I believe it has more layers.

    Forrest, sure, inauthentic is a word! I agree about Rourke. He was fantastic, but was essentially playing a version of himself–it was an example of perfect typecasting. Now DiCaprio in Revolutionary Road, or Langella in Frost/Nixon, those were really complex and powerful performances where they were playing character types they hadn’t fully tackled before. –DHS

  4. Demob Happy says:

    Hi David,

    Haven’t seen this as it hasn’t come out yet in France but it’s interesting to see you’ve bucked the trend here by giving it a so-so review. I’m looking forward to seeing it as I was briefly, geekily obsessed with American wrestling when I was about 14, to the extent that I knew all about the dingier minor federations: barbed wire matches and all. I have a funny memory of a bunch of guys hammering it out – perhaps this was the USWA league – for the keys to a brand new pick up truck, which were suspended from a pole above the ring. As a Brit going up in London, I was fascinated by this of course !

    Anyway, I digress, when I finally get to see The Wrestler i’ll let you know what I think !

    James

    James, if you were once a fan, you might find some of the wrestling scenes entertaining. I look forward to your thoughts on the film. –DHS

Provide your own Spin and tell us what you think!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s