The Spin on Christopher Nolan

NOTE TO READERS on 7-16-10Click here for the full Inception report and review.

In preparation for the release of Christopher Nolan’s highly anticipated and much ballyhooed Inception this Friday (stay tuned for a full report following the Thursday night 11:59pm advance showing I plan to attend), I decided to hold a mini-marathon here at the ‘Spin and take a look back on three of Nolan’s non-Gotham related works:  Memento, Insomnia and The Prestige.    

I make no apologies, and it should come as no surprise to anyone who knows me, that Nolan is one of my favorite working directors.  It’s been uncanny how well he has been able to work within the mainstream studio system and deliver the type of dark, twisted, psychologically complex, crowd-pleasing and zeitgeist-tapping films people crave in the new millennium.  It’s always interesting to do retrospectives of auteurs as you can witness over the course of a few nights the birth of their art, the refinement of their techniques and the emergence of their recurring themes.   

Christopher Nolan

First, we shall look at his breakthrough film, Memento (2000)This film was ranked rather highly in my look back on the best films of the 2000’s, but it’s also one of those films that never holds up as well as my memory of it, which is rather fitting, as it’s a film all about memory and the false ones we create for ourselves.  Watching it the other night, what really stands out (aside from the gimmick of being told backwards from the point-of-view of a protagonist with short-term memory loss) is how tightly Nolan controls the narrative and constructs the film.  For a film with a plot so jumbled, it’s shockingly linear (spare for the interwoven “telephone” sequence), and the way in which Nolan uses different shades and coloring to indicate the veracity or location of a moment is next to brilliant.  If his first film, Following, set the template for the types of stories he wanted to tell, then Memento set the template for his constant strive towards perfection.  He didn’t reach it here, but, man, what a rock-solid little indie film this is, and what a perfect harbinger of what was/is to come.    

Short-term memory quickly fades, and what lasts is that long-term memory of my first watching Memento in the theater and thinking, “Whoa.”   When our antihero Leonard closes the film with his internal monologue stating, “I just want to know that when I close my eyes, the world around me won’t disappear,” Nolan revealed to us his ever-evolving obsession.  At one point, Leonard refers to his condition as something like a dream…and, well…Nolan always planned on dreaming big.     

This brings us to a film about the absence of dreams and being haunted by waking nightmares…Insomnia (2002).  Here, Nolan showed he could work within the Hollywood studio system, get a pair of nearly washed-up A-listers (Al Pacino and Robin Williams) to deliver their last great performances before diving into the abyss of “what happened to their careers?” and set the template for how remakes should be done.  Adapted from a Norwegian thriller about a world-weary cop hunting down a tricky killer during a nightless summer near the arctic circle, Nolan changed the locale to Alaska and married the themes to mirror his own obsessions – mainly coming to terms with sins of the past by examining one’s own falsification of evidence and memories – in a place where the light of the sun and the light of truth shines on everything and everyone.     

When Pacino’s detective comes clean to Maura Tierney’s hotelier about the lengths he went to secure justice, it’s quite possibly the most emotionally charged and soul-purging scene Nolan has ever delivered.  Often dismissed because of its adherence to rote cat-and-mouse theatrics and hampered with the remake label, Insomnia, with all of its overt symbolism and gorgeous Alaskan scenery, is Nolan’s most underrated film.  It also set the template for how Nolan would accept the assignment of rebooting a comic-book hero franchise.  By showing Hollywood how a remake should be done with Insomnia, he was setting the stage for making Batman his own.   

Bookmarked between descents into the Batcave was The Prestige (2006) which has developed a rather rabid following in the four short years since its release and was recently a surprise pick in Allan Fish’s top ten films of the decade over at Wonders in the Dark.  And what a fitting name that blog is when considering the themes explored here by Nolan.  The most striking thing here is how much Nolan reveals to the audience about himself, how much he enjoys being the magician, the filmmaker, the one who can elicit…”that look on their faces…even if to fool them for just a second, to make them wonder.”   

Nolan’s mysterious and brooding tale of dueling magicians hangs on the notion of fooling the audience and that big twist, but it’s in the mechanization of the turns where fans have found what is to be truly relished on repeat viewings.  Part of the film’s success in that regard relies on Nolan’s faith in his audience, faith in our desire to be fooled, to want to wonder, in our ability to suspend disbelief.  There are great performances but also some dodgy acting, the menacing (all those water tanks) combined with the silly (all those hats), and the tightly wound turns choking any sign of plot holes and the ultimate simplicity of the prestige.   

It is here where Nolan announces himself as an auteur in complete control.  But he only has that control if the audience is willing to work in tandem in a communion in the darkened theater.  

We must dare him to fool us.  And he must not disappoint.  

Written by David H. Schleicher

Advertisements

5 comments on “The Spin on Christopher Nolan

  1. dianneglave says:

    I’ve just seen the repeated trailers on tv. Are the reviews that bad? I guess I’ll go check.

    Looking forward to reading your review.

    Di, the majority of reviews have been ecstatic. –DHS

  2. Jake Cole says:

    I love Nolan too, though I think all of his films contain one major flaw (distinct in each film) that holds each back from true greatness. But I like that, because he keeps reaching, and true ambition has become so rare in Hollywood (excluding the people at Pixar) that I look forward to his next film like a dog salivating for a meal.

    The only thing I dislike about Nolan is — and this isn’t his fault — the Rotten Tomatoes flock of sheep that have gathered around him. I read David Edelstein’s pan of Inception and while I obviously can’t agree or disagree, I think he defended himself well and the points he leveled against it are flaws I’ve seen in other Nolan works. But he’s tarred and feathered by people who haven’t even seen the film, who just want to believe in marketing hype (yeah, everyone, keep bashing critics for being out of touch when you’re nothing more than pawns). That mentality viciously stomps out dissent, and it actually encourages the true trolls like Armond White, who wrote such an incoherent mess that I think his editors didn’t so much neglect to proofread it before publishing but refused to. I love TDK enough to see the issues with it, and I wish people could step back long enough to stop following the soul-crushing wave of manufactured hype. That is the opposite of love for cinema.

    Jake, I totally agree. I always LOVE Nolan’s films on 1st view, but under closer scrutiny they become richer experiences because you can uncover recurring flaws as well as the development of grander themes. His ambition is what draws me to him, but I recognize where he often falls short as well. I think his success with TDK is what has engendered such fanboy unabashed raving. I try to be conscious of that no matter how much he wows me initially. –DHS

  3. David, this post is so timely for me as I just watched “Memento” for the first time 2 nights ago. I think Nolan has a great talent, but, as you say, the end products don’t always match up with the promise. I was really into “Memento” for about the first act, but the whole structure got overbearing and tedious. Though I loved that he had the creative guts to go out on a limb with a story like that. And I have to admit I didn’t see the end coming. I knew there was some kind of twist but I had a hand-slapping-the-forehead moment when I realized I should have seen it coming.

    I think “The Prestige” and “Dark Knight,” both flawed movies, are his best. (I haven’t seen “Insomnia for years and I think I was being snobby when I saw it because I really loved the original.) I’m curious to see “Inception” hopefully this weekend. It will be interesting to see whether we agree or not.

    Jason, I look forward to Inception leaving much to talk about. –DHS

  4. Dan says:

    I’m just curious, what are the major flaws you guys see in all his movies?

    • Dan – good question. I find he relies too much on expository dialogue, and his dialogue can sometimes come across as unrealistic and occasionally silly. His screenplays feel the need to explain EVERYTHING, which ties into the overuse of expository dialogue. Also, although he has corrected this, initially, his action scenes were choppy and hard to follow. And again, this has also been improved, but some of his films are too darkly lit for my tastes.

      All that being said – those are minor quibbles and things that I believe he is aware of and has tried to work on. Otherwise, I love his stories and his style and his ambition.

Provide your own Spin and tell us what you think!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s