Ridley and Russell Sitting in a Tree

Let’s get the elephant in the room out of the way first.  Russell Crowe is in his mid-forties and playing the “younger” Robin Hood — you know, as is the trend these days to show us how the men became the legends.  He’s utterly mis-cast in the role.  Being such a chameleon of an actor in his younger days has taken its toll on Mr. Crowe, and he hasn’t aged well.  He’s reached that point in his career where he now only plays Russell Crowe — you know, that bullish, overweight, talented dude full of piss and vinegar on and off the screen.  Thankfully, his old pal Ridley Scott still loves him, and you have to give the director some props for not giving a damn about the age thing (hell, Sir Ridley is in his seventies himself) and casting ol’ Russell in the title role of his revamp of Robin Hood.  He then had the good sense to cast (shouldn’t she be Dame by now?) Cate Blanchett as a feisty Lady Marion, and for fans of old school Hollywood epics, it’s a real treat to see two accomplished Oscar winners create palpable chemistry and act against each other within the comfortable context of well-worn characters.

Ridley Scott has traversed many genres, but he — more than any director out there — knows his way around historical epics.  Let’s not forget it was his first marriage to Russell Crowe in Gladiator that brought the two their biggest hit — and deservedly so.  His Robin Hood (though I already can imagine a bloated director’s cut coming to Blu-Ray) is surprisingly quick-footed.  Well paced and edited with meticulous attention to period detail, beautifully photographed, and featuring a well done by-the-numbers script that adds just enough psychological background to the characters, good humor, and politics for viewers to become invested in the retread of the legend, Scott’s Robin Hood arrives better than advertised.  It’s also great to see Scott learned from the one big mistake he made with Gladiator, where he relied to heavily on CGI to color in ancient Rome, and instead here leans on spectacular set pieces (the castles are extraordinary) and the natural British scenery (get a load of this Sherwood forest) to takes us back in time.  If there was any CGI used here, I couldn’t tell, and that’s a true sign of a top-notch crew.  When a film costs an obscene 200 million dollars to produce, it’s refreshing not to be insulted with shoddy production values and laughable effects.

While the two mega-star leads are up to the task, it’s usually the supporting cast that can make or break these types of overwrought epics.  Thankfully here they handle their task with aplomb with Danny Huston appearing all-too briefly but like gangbusters as King Richard the Lion-hearted, Mark Strong making an excellent French-talking bad guy, Oscar Isaac over-acting Joaquin Phoenix-style as Prince John, and Eileen Atkins superb as the queen mother.

There are times, of course, when certain moments play out like Gladiator redux or your mind might drift off and have a sidebar laugh about Robin Hood: Men in Tights, but for the most part Scott and company deliver the goods.  It never quite turns into the Ridley and Russell love-fest many had feared, thanks in large part to the presence of Cate Blanchett and Ridley’s unshakable desire to create the greatest archery scenes ever committed to film.  At one point near the end (and trust me, this really isn’t giving anything away) when one of our dastardly villains gets shot through the neck by one of Robin’s arrows, the two older ladies a few seats down from me in the theater squealed with glee.  It made me think of one of Maximus’ famous lines in Gladiator when after slaying his opponent in a make-shift ghetto coliseum, he screamed at the crowd, “Are you not entertained?”

Eh, yeah, I guess I was entertained…again.  Don’t go in expecting anyone to reinvent the wheel and you might have a good time in this Hood.  If the previews in front of the film are indicative of the tripe coming our way this summer, we should be thankful something like Robin Hood came around in May.  It’s a film that comfortably is what it is: generic but pretty damn good.

Written by David H. Schleicher

Advertisements

5 comments on “Ridley and Russell Sitting in a Tree

  1. This is always fun. Shall we rank Ridley Scott’s films? Here’s my rundown:

    Alien – 10/10
    Gladiator – 9.5/10
    Thelma & Louise – 9/10
    Someone to Watch over Me – 8.5/10
    Blackhawk Down – 8/10
    Matchstick Men – 8/10
    Robin Hood – 8/10
    Blade Runner – 7/10
    Hannibal – 7/10
    Kingdom of Heaven – 7/10
    1492: Conquest of Paradise – 6/10
    American Gangster – 6/10
    G.I. Jane – 5/10
    Legend – 4/10

    Have not seen: Black Rain, A Good Year and could only get through about ten minutes of Body of Lies

  2. Sam Juliano says:

    Glad to see you got something out of ROBIN HOOD, David. I will admit it did have it’s moments.

    OK, here we go:

    Blade Runner 10/10
    Alien 9/10
    Thelma and Louise 8/10
    Kingdom of Heaven 7/10
    Gladiator 7/10
    Matchstick Men 6/10
    Robin Hood 5/10
    Black Hawk Down 5/10
    Black Rain 5/10
    Hannibal 4/10
    Legend 4/10
    Body of Lies 3/10

  3. John Greco says:

    Scott’s work seems to be all over the map. I still need to see Gladiator, Black Hawk Down and quite a few others but of the ones I have seen I would rank Alien and Blade Runner at the top followed by American Gangster, Thelma and Louise, Someone To Watch Over Me with two terrible films, Body of Lies and A Good Year bringing up the rear.

    John, I think because Scott has tried so many different genres, his quality is often hit or miss. He also seems to be repeating things in his old age. –DHS

  4. John Greco says:

    Ha!,just realized I left off ROBIN HOOD which would fall right after SOMEONE TO WATCH OVER ME.

    John, I saw over there at your blog that you felt similiarly to the film as I did. –DHS

  5. Castor says:

    I enjoyed Robin Hood. It doesn’t reach greatness but certainly, it was entertaining. It is quite odd how divisive this movie has been as some people absolutely abhorred it while other thought it was good enough.

    Castor, I think some people just don’t care for this genre. I do, and I thought it was fairly good for this type of film. –DHS

Provide your own Spin and tell us what you think!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s